To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] rx 366 |
From: | Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Mon, 4 Jun 2012 21:58:11 +0000 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:16 PM, <kc9cdt@aol.com> wrote: > > I was told that it is GC, but the original second RX was a little better in > that mode.. I suspect the RX366 is actually a BETTER gc rx in all respects than the original except for out of band rejection. That's also assuming you have the appropriate roofing filter installed (original didn't need roofing filters). But I could be wrong. Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] rx 366, kc9cdt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] rx 366, John Molenda |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] rx 366, kc9cdt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] rx 366, John Molenda |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |