Darell
Ii just purchased an EAGLE used and I own both the earlier Jupiter and the
newer one, and when I turned on the Eagle I got a really big WOW ! The
dynamic range is out of sight it hears what other radios,, i.e. not made in
the USA kind just wish they could hear. I put it up against a couple well
known other brands and the difference was so great even I thought there
must just be something wrong with the other radios. So Ten Tec in my
opinion, has been doing their homework and really busy and come a long way.
I think I can say they are now in the big leagues on top of the pile. I
have been on the air and have received nothing but great audio reports
using the EAGLE. The receiver dynamic range is what it is all about this is
what set Collins apart from the rest years ago... I want to hear that weak
one and it is NOT ALL JUST SENITIVITY THAT NOISE FLOOR HAS TO BE SUCH THAT
IT DOES NOT COVER UP THAT WEAK SIGNAL. All those bells and whistles are
nice but you need to hear the other station to work them..
Bruce WA8HGX
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Darrell Bellerive <
drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com> wrote:
> For all of you who have been following my Jupiter experiment, I promised
> my first impressions.
>
> This all started with my desire to see if indeed I would like a DSP based
> radio. I have been entrenched in the analogue world and had not been
> impressed with the DSP gear I had the opportunity to use so far. But I
> wanted to give DSP another go and had never used a Ten-Tec DSP based radio.
> So a Jupiter seemed like a logical, lower cost way to try one out.
>
> My want ads resulted in a number of great offers, and I now have a very
> nice grey/green Jupiter that was manufactured at the end of 2002. This
> Jupiter does not have an internal antenna tuner (I have an LDG autotuner)
> and does not have the larger memory chip.
>
> After connecting up the radio, I was not impressed; In fact very
> disappointed. The first thing I was greeted with was loud microprocessor
> noise on 15 meters, loud receiver noise, and touchy AF and RF gain
> controls. I almost put the Jupiter back in the box and posted a for sale ad.
>
> The Jupiter had firmware version 1.23 b2 from late 2002. I thought I would
> upgrade to the latest firmware version and see if that made any difference.
>
> The radio would not accept 1.33 directly, but did take 1.29, and from
> there allowed me to update the PLD and load 1.33. So the radio is now at
> 1.33 b3, the latest firmware.
>
> The difference? Wow!!! This is a completely different radio; The
> microprocessor noise is just detectible if I go looking for it, the
> receiver is now quiet, and the AF and RF gain controls work as they should.
>
> I like what I see and hear so far. It will take me a while to get used to
> the user interface, try out all the features, and audition the sound
> quality, but that is exactly why I bought it.
>
> I will post my impressions after a number of weeks or perhaps months.
>
> Thank you to all who helped me with my questions and made offers.
>
> 73, Darrell VA7TO
>
>
> --
> Darrell Bellerive
> ______________________________**_________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|