TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Yaesu comparison

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Yaesu comparison
From: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-to: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:49:37 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Bob,

I believe you are discounting how well the "roofing
filter" really protects the actual "IF" chain?

Given today's platforms, the line is rather blurred 
as many would consider the "roofing filter" as being
part of the IF chain too.

Not nearly as easy to define as in years past as to
either the DSP or the "roofing filters".

Not so long ago, DSP was still primarily audio, not IF.

The DSP systems we have today are excellent, but tend 
to still need an additional filter placed ahead in the 
system to prevent overload and other challenges.

Rather interesting to see how Yaesu copied the K3,
which followed the Orion platform, after the failure
of their FT2000 platform with it's RX weaknesses.

Of course Rob Sherwood needs to be remembered for his 
work with the Drake platforms that started all of this!

73 de Billy, AA4NU


-----Original Message-----
>From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
>Sent: Jan 29, 2013 12:06 PM
>To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] Yaesu comparison
>
>First I'd say that a roofing filter has little to do with actual receiver IF 
>selectivity.  In other words, the roofing filter is pre the DSP selectivity 
>which would typically be less than the BW of the roofing filter.   Today's 
>receivers develop their selectivity in the DSP system.
>
>In the referenced video, I could not discern the DSP selectivity of the K3 
>or the FT-5000.   The Orion II BW is 520 Hz.
>
>
>73
>Bob, K4TAX
>
>
>DISCLOSURE:
>This is to inform all persons, I am a Tentec Ambassador and I receive 
>compensation according to the Tentec Ambassador program.  In addition, I 
>serve as a volunteer beta test person to Tentec for the Omni VII, Eagle and 
>Argonaut VI radios.  I hold no employment relationship, no financial 
>interests nor do I conduct any commercial business, direct or indirect, with 
>Tentec.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Dan Thompson" <w4uh@bellsouth.net>
>To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
>Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 3:05 PM
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] Yaesu comparison
>
>
>> Here is a You Tube comparing the K3, Orion II, & FT5000.
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SqVBkA535o
>>
>> 73, Dan W4UH
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>> k4elo@fastmail.fm
>> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 6:47 PM
>> To: tentec@contesting.com
>> Subject: [TenTec] Yaesu comparison
>>
>> Has anyone on the list had the chance to do an A/B comparison between
>> the Orion II and the Yaesu FTdx5000?  Particularly in terms of ssb
>> selectivity.
>>
>> I used to have an Orion II and sold it (bad move!), but now much later,
>> have a Yaesu FTdx5000, but I am not satisfied with it's selectivity,
>> maybe due to only a 3 kHz roofing filter.  So I am seriously thinking of
>> going back to the Orion with a 1.8 roofing filter.
>>
>> Any comments?
>>
>> Thanks and 73
>> Wayne
>> K4ELO
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>