TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor "TX IMD"

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor "TX IMD"
From: "Charles P. Steinmetz" <charles_steinmetz@lavabit.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 01:45:34 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Bob wrote:

There are many of these regulations that are really open to interpretation by the reader. What exactly is good amateur practice? I know how I was taught and as a broadcast engineer again the term "good engineering practice" is rather vague and quite broad.

Many FCC (and other government agency) rules may appear to be "open to interpretation by the reader," but they have usually already been interpreted by the agency and by courts for purposes of their application to regulated entities (radio operators, in the case of FCC rules). Regulated entities ignore these interpretations at their peril. They are found in the agency's administrative and enforcement decisions and in court orders, and sometimes in other rule sections. Generally, one needs access to a third-party service like Westlaw to do efficient searches in the FCC decisions, and certainly to search court cases.

Agency rules are just the starting point when it comes to administrative law (the law dealing with administrative agencies).

Best regards,

Charles




_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>