Carter, yes, I totally agree, my mention of the OCFD was largely triggered by
many happy memories and the complete lack of difficulties that antenna made for
me. Don't get me started on all the "antennas" I used as a kid. And OTOH I
didn't hit the Honor Roll with it either ;)
73
Mike
On 07/11/13, Carter<k8vt@ameritech.net> wrote:
On 7/10/2013 11:33 PM, Michael Tortorella wrote:
> I feel compelled to weigh in here....back in the late '70s I used an
> OCFD design from Ham Radio magazine which was pretty straightforward.
> It was 135' long, fed with 44' of 300-ohm open wire to a 4:1 balun
> and then a run of RG-11 into the shack. It was superb. Never had any
> stray current problems. Worked about 150 countries using a Johnson
> Navigator, 40 watts input. Would like to reproduce that next time
> out. Don't pooh-pooh the OCFD design, be careful and it works well.
> 73 Mike W2IY
I smile when I see everybody describing their favorite wire antenna, so
let me jump in with my comments (asbestos suit on). <grin>
Mike, not to deny your success nor picking on you or anyone else
describing their favorite wire antenna...but with ANY antenna, the RF
has to go somewhere.
I'm using a dipole about 130 feet long and maybe 25 feet off the ground
fed entirely with ladder line (and a Johnson Matchbox) and worked a LOT
of DX including Indonesia on 80, the VK0IR dxpedition and even North
Korea on RTTY with that antenna.
Heck, Kurt N. Sterba wrote in 'World Radio' magazine that he used a
SHOPPING CART as an antenna during a DX contest and worked 17 countries!
Again, the RF has gotta go somewhere.
Bottom line: DX performance seems more attributable to the Propagation
gods rather than what flavor of wire antenna is being used.
73,
Carter K8VT
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|