To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution |
From: | Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:20:30 -0400 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Why not use the internal balun in the 238? Sent from my iPhone On Jul 11, 2013, at 3:00 PM, "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> wrote: > Mike, the tuner was not designed for 400 Ohms and you won't see any > noticeable difference. > > Once you get to the shack with your openwire, you need to run it through > some sort of a balun to the tuner, OR you can use the built-in balun, WHICH > I DO NOT RECOMMEND. > > _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution, Kimberly Elmore |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution, Mike Bryce |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution, Kimberly Elmore |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |