TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TT 238C will not tune

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TT 238C will not tune
From: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 07:42:37 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
*When I have a problem such as this, the MFJ Analyzer comes in real handy.
So much better than trying to tune up with the radio. Work your way up or
down from a frequency that will tune well and you should find the sweet
spot. Have you tried adding or shortening the Coax/Feed Line by a small
amount? On one installation we had to leave an 8 foot section of RG-213 in
circuit to get things to match. Later the fellow raised the antenna by 20
feet and the Coax was no longer needed. Finding the correct match can be
daunting. Best of luck to you. 73 .....*
*                                               Wade/KJ4WS*

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 7/27/2013 7:15 PM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
>   Now if the inductance is maximum value then
>
>> it is very apparent where Z should be located, either on the input of L
>> or the output of L.  I believe it general practice to start with maximum
>> inductance for adjustment of any L network.
>>
>
> ______________________________**_______________
>
>
>         Hmmm...  so it appears the instruction manual
>         does not describe the best approach?  I understood
>         the user manual to say I should start with zero
>         on the Inductor, and the Capacitor at around 2.
>
>         In contrast, based on your description, it appears
>         I would be better off starting with the inductor in
>         the middle - away from either end - and that starting
>         there will make it more obvious what initial capacitor
>         setting to select on the BYPASS switch.  I know that
>         is not "maximum" - but it would assure that I started
>         working against a substantial inductance, rather
>         than zero.
>
> Or... have I misunderstood?
>
> ---------- Thanks - K8JHR  -----------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> --.
> ______________________________**_________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>