TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT: Rob Sherwood's impression of the FLEX 6x00

To: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Rob Sherwood's impression of the FLEX 6x00
From: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 23:02:29 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Not an argument... but a question:    How do we know it is
the transceiver and not the amp in a given case?

Reason for asking, is I anticipate the transceiver makers
blaming the amp market for it.   Is there a way to decide, or
do we have to run each barefoot and then with an amp?  or what?

Again... not an argument... a question on how to keep the
rig makers from saying the amps are the fault.

-----------------  K8JHR  -----------------------

On 4/23/2014 10:49 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
  I often see signals
that are so broad that they are in violation of FCC Rules for spurious
emissions by a wide margin. I've also got an HP spectrum analyzer.

_________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>