That's true if one has the space to dedicate another PC and monitor and mouse
and whatever else is needed. Certainly that would be a bit easier to see but I
would never run it on the same PC I'm using for logging, rig control, digital
decode, cluster etc...that already is busy and using two monitors and plenty of
horsepower.
That's where the attraction of a capable built in with external monitor
capability or a P3 implementation comes from.....
Not sure why that's hard to understand....
Cecil
K5DL
Sent from my iPad
> On May 6, 2014, at 7:32 PM, Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> I couldn't agree more.
>
> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> 58 Hogwood Rd
> Louisburg, NC 27549
> www.n4py.com
>
>> On 5/6/2014 10:46 AM, Rsoifer--- via TenTec wrote:
>> Guys
>>
>> I don't understand why the issue of a panadaptor display keeps coming up.
>> The Elecraft panadaptor is a pretty box, but the function is much better
>> performed through a PC interface than a display on the radio.
>>
>> 73 Ray W2RS
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 4/8/2014 7:30:11 P.M. GMT Standard Time,
>> jhenry@tentec.com writes:
>>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> That is one item I will not talk about until the day we either ship it or
>> can it.
>> Given this items track record.
>> All I can officially say is.... We have not dropped it from development
>> yet.
>> But, for clarification, the design is for the 588 internally, to add a
>> continuous sweep that it currently does not provide. It would be in place
>> of the slow "snap shot" sweep that kills the receiver during that time. At
>> time of first production, it followed the Jupiter sweep, which was greatly
>> liked by most hams, but, technology changes, competitors add features, so,
>> they now expect the 588 to have it. Since it is still in production (and
>> yes, plan to for many years, best laid plans though)
>>
>> It isn't dead yet.
>> Personally, I don't think it will be killed, because we do realize it is an
>> integral part of future rigs, regardless of the fact that it will just be a
>> sweep (maybe also with waterfall, that part isn't ironed out in the 588
>> firmware yet) and not a fully featured sweep that is provided on a PC
>> today. It is still useful. Especially for single receiver type rigs like
>> the OMNI-VII.
>>
>> And to answer Rick DJ0IP on "modular/optional", yes, as with TEN-TEC rigs
>> of the past, we follow that into future rigs that will have a LOT of
>> options, so that someone can start with a single transceiver x, then add a
>> tuner, or a second receiver, external fan, optional filters, bluetooth,
>> high speed sweeps, spigots for I&Q, transverter outputs, etc., etc. all
>> optional and hopefully customer upgrade-able.
>>
>> Thanks, and 73,
>> John Henry, KI4JPL
>> TEN-TEC Engineering
>>
>> ==============================================
>>
>> John Henry,
>>
>> All the discussion on these great features and more this past week,
>> resurected one particular feature that I’ve lost touch with from Ten
>> Tec - the external high definition pan adapter video display that as I
>> understood was being developed and protos built at one time, not all
>> that long ago. I realize the same came be accomplished with several
>> adjunct boxes today, but was wondering if this piece of optional
>> equipment is gone forever from Ten Tec?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve - W5JK
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|