TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Plus: No RX or TX on 10 meters (Intermittent)

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Plus: No RX or TX on 10 meters (Intermittent)
From: "A R" <raf_3@msn.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 10:12:52 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
   
QSL. In my former life in military and space electronics, I spent many hundreds 
of hours chasing RoHS-induced problems (today they're called "issues"), 
including the microscopic fracturing of solder connections between component 
leads and board conductors/traces, AND the growth of unintended conduction 
paths on board surfaces called "dendritic whiskers". In industries where 
reliability is absolutely critical and essential, the solution is generally an 
"exemption" from RoHS compliance. 

 

73,

Allen--W7GIF 


----- Original Message ----- 

From: Jim Allen<mailto:jim.allen@longhornband.net> 

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment<mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 

Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 9:55 AM

Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Plus: No RX or TX on 10 meters (Intermittent)



So the new radios have a built in failure mode that the "boat anchors" did not?

That's unnerving?

73 de W6OGC Jim Allen 

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:25 AM, A R <raf_3@msn.com<mailto:raf_3@msn.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> Welcome to the lead-free world of RoHS. Your spools of 60/40 solder are NOT 
> RoHS-compliant...but will likely improve reliability of solder connections 
> which are subjected to the stresses of expansion/contraction of dissimilar 
> materials due to thermal excursions. Sn-Pb is more ductile, and as a result 
> more tolerant of the thermal excursion stresses, than the RoHS-compliant 
> solders. 
> 
> 
> 
> 73,
> 
> Allen--W7GIF
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: Jim 
> Allen<mailto:jim.allen@longhornband.net<mailto:jim.allen@longhornband.net>> 
> 
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec 
> Equipment<mailto:tentec@contesting.com<mailto:tentec@contesting.com>> 
> 
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 5:46 AM
> 
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Plus: No RX or TX on 10 meters (Intermittent)
> 
> 
> 
> I'm glad you found the fix.
> 
> Why is it there are so many re-solder fixes these days.  I don't recall ever 
> hearing about resoldering on the old gear.  Anybody ever have to fix a 75A4 
> or SX101, etc. by resoldering some connections?
> 
> 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Jul 6, 2015, at 7:39 AM, Joe Papworth via TenTec 
>> <tentec@contesting.com<mailto:tentec@contesting.com<mailto:tentec@contesting.com%3Cmailto:tentec@contesting.com>>>
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> It appears to be fixed and in repairing it, I fixed another annoying 
>> problem, which was spurs and floaters on ten meters only. Those had been 
>> plaguing me for several years.
>> 
>> 
>> First, thanks to Paul at Ten Tec for pointing me in the right direction and 
>> to Mark, K8VF, and others for their suggestions.
>> 
>> 
>> Paul was right. The problem was on the Xtal Osc/LO board. The repair process 
>> went like this:
>> 
>> 
>> 1) I looked at the schematic of the board and saw there are 4 separate xtal
>> ? ? oscillators for ten meters (I assume one for each 500 Khz band segment)
>> ? ? Since I was losing the entire band, I knew it wasn't one of those 
>> circuits.?
>> ? ? That eliminated a lot of circuitry as a possible cause.
>> 
>> 
>> 2) After reading the theory of operation, I pretty much narrowed things down 
>> ? ? to the L9, L10, and L11 circuits, plus the Q4 and Q5 circuits.
>> 
>> 
>> 3) I resoldered every component in those areas and voila, no more spurs or
>> ? ? floaters and so far, RX and TX are fine. (I'm fairly certain the rig 
>> would
>> ? ? have failed?by?now)
>> 
>> 
>> Later, Joe
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com%3Cmailto:TenTec@contesting.com>>
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec%3Chttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com%3Cmailto:TenTec@contesting.com>>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec%3Chttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>