TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4
From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 08:48:01 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Paul you're measuring specifically cw transmit latency, correct?

You did a really professional job of it - nice work!

73, Barry N1EU

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net> wrote:

> > Sorry Barry, latency measured on the Anan does not necessarily apply to
> the FLEX 6000.
>
> I made timing and latency measurements of my Flex 6700 using an Agilent
> 4-channel DSO.  I captured the data and uploaded the DSO graphic images.
> Keep an eye on the PTT trace from the external keyer as the timing
> reference.    QSK performance has improved further since the date of these
> measurements.  QSK performance is at least as good as the K3 and the many
> Ten Tecs I've owned.   It is fast.  At 40+ wpm, I don't feel like I'm
> dragging characters behind me due to any latency, and there are no
> headphone
> audio thumps or clicks in CW T/R transitions.
>
>
> https://community.flexradio.com/flexradio/topics/flex_6700_cw_keying_v_elecr
> aft_k3
>
> Paul, W9AC
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>