Well, image #7 shows the latency from the time of physical key-up to the
point Rx audio is present. It shows a lot of other interesting things going
on too.
Paul, W9AC
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry N1EU
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 8:48 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 4
Paul you're measuring specifically cw transmit latency, correct?
You did a really professional job of it - nice work!
73, Barry N1EU
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net> wrote:
> > Sorry Barry, latency measured on the Anan does not necessarily apply
> > to
> the FLEX 6000.
>
> I made timing and latency measurements of my Flex 6700 using an
> Agilent 4-channel DSO. I captured the data and uploaded the DSO graphic
images.
> Keep an eye on the PTT trace from the external keyer as the timing
> reference. QSK performance has improved further since the date of these
> measurements. QSK performance is at least as good as the K3 and the many
> Ten Tecs I've owned. It is fast. At 40+ wpm, I don't feel like I'm
> dragging characters behind me due to any latency, and there are no
> headphone audio thumps or clicks in CW T/R transitions.
>
>
> https://community.flexradio.com/flexradio/topics/flex_6700_cw_keying_v
> _elecr
> aft_k3
>
> Paul, W9AC
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|