TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Some advice, please

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Some advice, please
From: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:01:32 +0200
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
For that matter, the OMNI V was true innovation.
It was light-years ahead of Japanese random noise generators at the time.

The conclusion of a thorough transceiver test in a Multi-Multi environment
in 1990 by the Bavarian Contest Club two radios to be in a league of their
own, head and shoulders above ALL JA radios:  my Omni V and a Drake 4C line
with Sherwood filters.

All others had problems either being disturbed on receive by transmitters
transmitting on other bands, or were the cause of broadband (all band)
disturbance to all other radios during transmit.  The culprit was phase
noise, which Ten-Tec managed to keep very low with the OMNI V (later VI)
design.

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)


-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry N1EU
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:29 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Some advice, please

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Don Hall <donhall161@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> The Elecraft K3 comes to mind.



Blasphemy!  The true innovation was the Orion, 5 years earlier with
essentially the same architecture.

Barry N1EU



>     On Thursday, May 19, 2016 2:28 PM, JAMES HANLON 
> <knjhanlon@msn.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>  Y'all,
>
> I've taken on the job of talking to the Albuquerque Hamfest this 
> coming August about significant advances in amateur radio technology 
> from the beginning of radio, Marconi 1894, to the present.  I'm up to 
> the early 70s so far and I have just added the advent of Solid State 
> Transceivers to the list, using the 505 Argonaut and the Triton I and
Triton II as examples.
> I'm a little fuzzy on things more modern than that.  Obviously I 
> should include things like digital modes and software-defined radios.  
> What would you folks suggest I should include, and can you cite any 
> Ten-Tec or other gear that would illustrate the particular advance?
>
> Thanks a lot for your help.
>
> Jim, W8KGI
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>