TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300
From: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 21:42:16 +0200
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
DESPITE that Jim, we had a couple of DX-peditions that would have gone south
without them - at least on 160m.

One of our teams flew out to Tobago once for CQWW.
A couple days later I got a call asking to borrow one of my noise cancelors
(I had several).
One team member had not left Munich yet so he hand-carried the ANC-4 with
him.
It absolutely saved the day on 160m.

Had a similar situation in Morocco where the team simply took all of my
noise cancelors with them when they went.
Again it was a great help on 160m.

However, I had original ANC-4s (which was a rip-off from the SEM
QRP-eliminator).
I sold ALL my gear when I moved to the states in 2007.
Bought a new ANC-4 in the states, AFTER the product had been sold to its
current manufacturer and subjectively, I had the feeling it was not anywhere
as good as my originals.

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)



-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 7:49 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300

On Tue,9/13/2016 6:33 AM, rick@dj0ip.de wrote:
> I'm not a fan of RF sensing.  Hot switching?  No thanks.
> You may get away with it in SSB but not in CW.

Nor am I. The RF sensing in the ANC-4 Noise Canceller introduces nasty
clicks.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>