TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300

To: <k9yc@arrl.net>, "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300
From: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:21:19 +0200
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Oh, I see Jim, you were using the carrier detected switching.

We didn't do that.

We had them installed in the RX antenna loop (the mod with 2x RCA Phono
Jacks to the back panel).
They were not switched at all; always in-line.

As I said, you guys in the states don't realize how lucky you are... or
were.
The condx here were so miserable and everyone in our contesting team
modified their radios to accept pre-selectors.
Most built our Bavarian Contest Club Preselector... the design MFJ copied.
I of course had an original Braun, a home-brew Braun cline, and my 40m
tunable.
You could connect both the preselector and the ANC-4 to the pair of jacks
(in series).

It really helps a lot to have this mod in the radio.
Of course the K3 has it by default, (perhaps) because when I created the mod
for my K2 and sent it to Eric, it somehow found its way into the K3.

Jack implemented it into the OM7 and Eagle as a result of audio files I sent
him showing the difference it makes.

IN THE MEANTIME, things have gotten a lot better here.
Our receivers got a lot better, our 40m ham band was expanded from 100 to
200 KHz, and all of the shortwave broadcast stations had to move above 7200.
Radio China used to sit within our 100 kHz ham band.

As a result of Orion, K3, 7800, etc., our preselectors disappeared . . . at
least for a while.
It looks like we will be dragging them out again for the new SDR radios.
One step forward, two steps back.

Hopefully I am wrong, as I have not played with any of the new SDR
technology radios (one exception).
Obviously the 6500s and 6700s won't need the preselector.

I keep watching the BCC reflector after every major contest to see if there
is any feedback on using SDRs.
Last year we had one station reporting using two 6500s.  Had mixed feelings.
RX was outstanding but ergonomics left a lot to be desired.  Others are very
slow to take the risk.  They don't want to risk not making a high score in
the big contests.  

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)



-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 10:02 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300

On Tue,9/13/2016 12:42 PM, rick@dj0ip.de wrote:
> One of our teams flew out to Tobago once for CQWW.
> A couple days later I got a call asking to borrow one of my noise 
> cancelors (I had several).
> One team member had not left Munich yet so he hand-carried the ANC-4 
> with him.
> It absolutely saved the day on 160m.

But it would also have made your signal VERY wide if used on CW. That is NOT
acceptable behavior, no matter what the cause, which is why I stopped using
it except in an RX antenna loop (like in the K3, and in the mods you do to
your rigs). Just as an unmodified FT1000MP is unacceptable on CW, so is the
ANC-4 using carrier detect switching.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>