Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Re: Increasing bandwidth 160m L

To: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>, <k8do@mailblocks.com>,<topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Re: Increasing bandwidth 160m L
From: "john battin" <jbattin@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:08:10 -0600
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tom Rauch<mailto:w8ji@contesting.com> 
  To: k8do@mailblocks.com<mailto:k8do@mailblocks.com> ; 
topband@contesting.com<mailto:topband@contesting.com> 
  Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 7:12 AM
  Subject: Re: Topband: Re: Increasing bandwidth 160m L


  > Can't be done... If you intend to cover the band get busy
  building
  > either a remote tuner or switched/tapped networks for
  matching..


  A thicker element will increase bandwidth.

  An element that is self-resonant will increase bandwidth
  over one that is intentionally too long or short.

  A very low reactance parallel L/C circuit across the
  feedpoint will increase bandwidth. (The reactance of each
  component has to be a low value, that's why stubs like
  coaxial cable stubs used in coaxial dipoles and such won't
  do much of anything unless they are very low Z or you
  parallel multiple low-loss low-Z stubs.)

  I'm reasonably sure a combination of these three techniques
  would easily cover all of 160 meters without retuning.

  73 tom
    


  Another approach would be to use a series/paralllel reactance to tune out the 
reactance and then use a toroid transformer to transform the impedance. This 
should be broader.
  John K9DX
  _______________________________________________
  Topband mailing list
  Topband@contesting.com<mailto:Topband@contesting.com>
  
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband>
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>