So WHAT IS the manufacturers part number of an adequate relay?
Carl
KM1H
 ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
To: "Tim Shoppa" <tshoppa@gmail.com>; "Mike Waters" <mikewate@gmail.com>
Cc: "topband" <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: TX relays
 Because there are many things that go into relay selection that do not 
show on a data sheet, I always dissect and test relays.
 I have found 30 amp power relays that overheat at 5 amps at 28 MHz, and 
relays that have high contact voltage ratings that make the pole inside 
the coil hot with full RF. They wind up with 20-30 pF capacitance from 
armature to coil.
 Another issue is resistance and reliability at near zero contact voltage 
when receiving. This is probably the single biggest relay issue in our 
applications. A small bifurcated contact relay is better for receive 
reliability, and a high current hot switch design is by far the worse for 
receive reliability.
 One particularly troublesome high power area for current are the relay 
internal leads, and the contact support bar materials. The things that 
make the wires and contact bars last a long time in repeated cycles create 
very high radio frequency resistances. This is why some large 30 amp power 
relays will discolor contacts or melt insulation at several amps on higher 
frequencies.
 The same thing applies to contacts. Contact materials and platings that 
optimize hot switching create RF resistance and low level signal 
connection issues.  A gold flash on a soft contact, for example, is 
excellent for receive but will instantly deteriorate if hot switched at 
more than a few hundred milliamperes or with an inductive load. It might 
handle 20 amps of closed contact RF current, but only be rated for a few 
amps of hot switching current. In contrast, a silver cadmium oxide contact 
can take tons of hot switch voltage and current, but is lousy for relay 
receive pass through.
 Contact support bars, and the wires used in some relays, can also be very 
problematic. This is because the materials and any weave in wires is 
designed for flexibility. Alloys and construction that improves mechanical 
cycle life greatly reduces RF performance.
> Mike, I would be concerned about using these small relays for
non-resonant
 
antenna switching where the impedance at the switch point may be wildly
away from 50 ohms.
This is the relay I use to switch tuning networks at non-50-ohm points:
http://www.deltrol-controls.com/products/relays/power-relays/900
Deltrol is the brand you get if you order from McMaster-Carr but all the
big relay manufacturers sell these open frame relays.
 I also bend the relay contacts for wider spacing as recommended by N6RK 
in
QST (page 66, May 2009 QST Hints and Kinks, "Increasing Relay Voltage
Handling"). Open contact gap of 0.5 inches is readily achievable.
Tim N3QE
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> wrote:
 
This relay looks exactly what I was looking for to remote-switch my 160m
 inverted-L to other bands, because it will withstand a lot of voltage. 
From
the PDF:
High insulation
Insulation distance (between coil and contacts): 10mm min.
Dielectric strength: 5KV
Surge strength: 10KV
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Thomas PA1M <t.b.tinge@gmail.com> wrote:
>  Fujitsu FTR-K1CK012W
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
 
 
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4037/8351 - Release Date: 10/08/14
 
 
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4040/8354 - Release Date: 10/09/14
  
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
 
 |