To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Rohn 55, vs 65 |
From: | K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com) |
Date: | Mon, 10 Aug 1998 10:16:59 EDT |
In a message dated 98-08-10 01:29:02 EDT, wa7fab@cdsnet.net writes: > On one of my > communication sites I have two hundred feet of 55 guyed at three > levels. The top of couple of sections carry a six bay FM station > antenna and from there on down to the thirty foot level it is totally > loaded with antennas for all types of commercial users including another > three bay FM station antenna.. Its on a mountain top about sixty air > miles east of the Oregon coast, subjected to strong winds and some > icing in the winter with never a problem. I can't imagine needing > anything larger than 55 for any reasonable ham installation. Provided > its guyed properly. The Rohn tower brochure has all the specs and > guying information. Just for the record, the Rohn 55G specs call for four sets of guys @ 70 MPH and five sets for 90 MPH. Some of the coastal counties are in the 80-85 MPH range so that would have been the safe spec to use. Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] 25G Rotator Plate., Kurt Andress |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] 25G Rotator Plate., K7LXC@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Towers & Trees, Barry Kutner |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Rohn 55, vs 65, John Brosnahan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |