To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Rohn 55, vs 65 |
From: | wa7fab@cdsnet.net (Van Sias) |
Date: | Sun, 09 Aug 1998 22:27:51 +0100 |
Since there is a rather significant difference in new price of 55 vs 65 I thought I would pass along my experience with Rohn 55. On one of my communication sites I have two hundred feet of 55 guyed at three levels. The top of couple of sections carry a six bay FM station antenna and from there on down to the thirty foot level it is totally loaded with antennas for all types of commercial users including another three bay FM station antenna.. Its on a mountain top about sixty air miles east of the Oregon coast, subjected to strong winds and some icing in the winter with never a problem. I can't imagine needing anything larger than 55 for any reasonable ham installation. Provided its guyed properly. The Rohn tower brochure has all the specs and guying information. Good luck. Van, K7VS -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Power Line Proximity and another question, John Guida |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Solar Flux ought to remain High, Jim Reid |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Rohn 55, vs 65, Wes Attaway |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Rohn 55, vs 65, Gregg Corsello |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |