Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] 9913 Reliability

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] 9913 Reliability
From: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:04:26 EST
In a message dated 12/19/01 6:39:20 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
pwomble1@tampabay.rr.com writes:

> While I agree that 9913 is probably not the best choice out there...I
>  have to say that I had 2 runs of 9913 up for about 3 years.  When I
>  replaced it with hardline, I cut open the cable in a couple of places
>  and there was no water inside the cable.
>  
>  9913 is not bad cable...you just have to be extra careful sealing
>  connectors & making sure there are no nicks or cuts anywhere to let H2O
>  in.

    I would hazard a guess that most, if not all, 9913 moisture problems are 
due to poor weatherproofing. Check the TT archives at www.contesting.com for 
some good write-ups on the RIGHT way to do it.

Cheers,
Steve    K7LXC
Tower Tech 

AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers are now available!  Windloading tables,
foundation diagrams and charts, along with full details are now at the
AN Wireless Web site:  http://www.ANWireless.com

-----
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>