Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps

To: <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps
From: "n3drk" <n3drk@triad.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 21:02:20 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
> IS BLATANTLY DAMNING A VERY WELL DONE EFFORT!

I am not damning a very well done effort. Yes the effort was there but it is
not scientific. Read your handbook.

Seeing as one of the guys who performed these tests was a former
> employee of the TH7's designer I would have to say this one (accusation)
> just don't hold water!  And, the other guy is without doubt one of the
> brightest individuals I have ever met!!!!!
>
> Kinda suspect that they will let you know their feelings on your
> statement...
>
Well he may very well be without doubt one of the brightest individuals you
may have met!!!!
And if they let me know their feellings, well so what? I have my opinion and
they have theirs.

One thing on this reflector goes on. If one individual makes a post about
his trap antenna, posts are then sent to that individual and to the
reflector putting down the traps and advising they purchase the force 12 non
trap antennas. Others do the same but tell the person to purchase the
tribander report. This is a very prejudiced reflector and when others make a
post or a reply saying otherwise,,,,,,they are condemned. I have been
reading these posts for the past year and have never replied like I did
today. Its my opinion this report is unscientific and do the research
yourself. Read your handbook.

Finished replying on such a no brainer.

john





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>
To: "n3drk" <n3drk@triad.rr.com>
Cc: "Dan Levin" <djl@andlev.com>; <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps


> NOPE
>
> Having read the tribander report and seen the presentation on how it was
> done I would have to say that when n3drk wrote:
>
> "Don't get rid of the TH7 it is one of the best antennas out there even
> with all the hype of the so called unscientific tribander report."
>
> IS BLATANTLY DAMNING A VERY WELL DONE EFFORT!
>
> What basis do you have to call the report unscientific?
>
> Seeing as one of the guys who performed these tests was a former
> employee of the TH7's designer I would have to say this one (accusation)
> just don't hold water!  And, the other guy is without doubt one of the
> brightest individuals I have ever met!!!!!
>
> Kinda suspect that they will let you know their feelings on your
> statement...
>
> 73,
>
> Jim, K4OJ
>
>
> n3drk wrote:
> > And you could put some screen netting like a dxer did who made DXCC#1.
Yes
> > that is what he did and there is nothing wrong with your antenna. Dont
get
> > rid of the TH7 it is one of the best antennas out there even with all
the
> > hype of the so called unscientific tribander report. Save your money.
The
> > TH7 will outperform the c-31XR.
> >      This debate has been going on since the 1960's. Stay with your TH7.
> > Dont get caught up in all this novelty stuff. The people who push these
non
> > trap antennas go by what is in that tribander report and like i said an
> > unscientific one at that. One cannot dispute mathematics. Gain is a
product
> > of Boom Length.
> >
> > john
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Dan Levin" <djl@andlev.com>
> > To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:39 PM
> > Subject: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps
> >
> >
> >
> >>>One of my TH7s started acting flaky recently, so I dropped the two
> >>>driven elements and took the traps apart.
> >>>
> >>>I wonder if anyone has a solution to prevent all this crud from
> >>>getting into the traps?
> >>
> >>Flame Suit On
> >>
> >>You could just get rid of the TH7 and get an antenna with
> >>no traps - like a C-31XR...
> >>
> >>Said with tongue firmly planted in cheek.
> >>
> >>Best 73,
> >>                  ***dan, K6IF
> >>
> >>See you all in the California QSO Party,
> >>October 4-5!
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>
> >>See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
> >
> > Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with
any
> > questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> >
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>TowerTalk mailing list
> >>TowerTalk@contesting.com
> >>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
>
>
>

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>