To: | "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>, "n3drk" <n3drk@triad.rr.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps |
From: | Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:10:40 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
At 10:37 AM 9/12/2003 -0400, Rex Lint wrote:
john, A more rigorous statement (fully defensible as laws of physics) might be: The maximum achievable gain (not directivity) is a function of physical size, and all other factors being equal, larger physical size means larger gain. However, such a statement isn't worth much, other than as a general, "there's no substitute for height and size" kind of argument.. John's original statement would be better stated as "In general, longer booms allow designs with more gain, without sacrificing other performance parameters." Jim, W6RMK _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] guying to trees, T. Nawrocki |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps, Paul Playford |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps, Rex Lint |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps, Paul Playford |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |