Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Wire Size for 800 meter longwire

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Wire Size for 800 meter longwire
From: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:54:17 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
The gain decrease is because of wire surface area.  Conductivity of 
aluminum is actually less than zinc, but the surface area of a #17 wire 
is much smaller than the surface area of a 1/2 inch diameter cable.

The pattern formed by a long wire is very complex.  There are large 
numbers of lobes and nulls, both in the azimuth and elevation 
directions.  Most of these are very narrow.  Because of this any small 
phase change in the current, causes large changes in the pattern. 

Visualize this: These phase changes at the source end, have several 
wavelengths in which to accumulate a total phase change at the other 
end. For this antenna, at low elevation angles on 160 meters, 16 lobes 
are formed in the azmuith direction. These are created by the sum of 
currents from all segments along the wire. A small phase shift and 
instead of 16 lobes being formed, 18 or 14 lobes are formed.  This makes 
the position of these lobes change.  This occurs both in the azimuth and 
elevation directions. This is unlike a dipole where there are two big 
lobes parallel to the wire, and requires huge phase changes to show any 
change in the pattern.

Because these changes happen in the elevation direction as well as the 
azmuith direction, there are frequencies where the antenna appears 
omini-directional, and other frequencies at which the pattern is very 
dependent on the azmuith direction.  For some azmuith directions it may 
have only 4 narrow lobes, and other in directions there may be a null 
and the gain will be down many dB.  The pattern is extremely complex.

Jerry, K4SAV

Barry wrote:

>Something else to think about...
>In my (limited) experience, if a model changes dramatically for a 
>small change in length, height, etc., there is probably something 
>wrong with the model.
>Barry, W2UP
>
>On 13 Oct 2005 Joe Giacobello wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Jerry, I have not followed this thread very closely, but is the 
>>reduction in gain with galvanized from resistive losses?
>>
>>73, Joe
>>
>>K4SAV wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>An update on the 800 meter long wire performance.
>>>
>>>Using 17 ga aluminum wire vs 0.5 inch galvanized cable I had first
>>>assumed, decreases the gain by about 3.7 dB.
>>>
>>>The antenna pattern is very sensitive to the exact overall length.
>>>Looking at it another way, it is sensitive to frequency change.  A
>>>frequency change of 50 KHz changes what used to be a peak lobe into a
>>>null (looking mostly at the pattern off the end of the wire).  For
>>>example, off the end of the wire, at 1.8 Mhz and an elevation angle
>>>of 10 degrees the gain may be -1 dB.  Move to 1.85 MHz and the gain
>>>is -13 dB, same angle.
>>>
>>>The method of feeding the wire also effects the pattern.  I assumed
>>>end fed with the shield dropping straight down into the salt water. 
>>>This seems to produce the best pattern I could find.
>>>
>>>Implementing a vee beam with an 80 degree included angle seems to
>>>reduce the pattern into something that is very scrambled and with
>>>lower gain.
>>>
>>>I am normally unsure about simulator performance when wires are close
>>>to the ground, but in this case since this is an almost perfect
>>>ground, this seems to be within the guideline of the simulator.  The
>>>simulator shows very little difference between using perfect ground
>>>and salt water except between 0 and 3 degrees elevation.
>>>
>>>Jerry, K4SAV
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>
>>>See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers",
>>>"Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free,
>>>1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>TowerTalk mailing list
>>>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>>See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers",
>>"Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free,
>>1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>TowerTalk mailing list
>>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>    
>>
>
>--
>Barry Kutner, W2UP              Internet: w2up@mindspring.com
>Newtown, PA                     Frankford Radio Club
>         
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
>Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any 
>questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>