Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] antennas in water

To: CRAIG CLARK <jcclark@wildblue.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] antennas in water
From: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:17:07 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
CRAIG CLARK wrote:

>My 160 vertical is located in a fresh water swamp. The key to it's success
>has been the thousands of feet of radial wire I have laid down.....not on
>the water. I located it there as it was away from the house and out of sight
>from the wife and the road, not for any perceived benefit from location.
>
>Fresh water is not a good conductor. 
>

I don't think anyone is disputing that, Craig, but neither is dry rocky 
soil a good conductor (trust me, I have first hand experience with lousy 
soil). Seawater is clearly superior to either of these two by several 
orders of magnitude (about 3 in the case of average soil). The relavent 
questions are whether rain soaked soil or fresh water lakes are 
significantly better than average or poor soil. I suspect the answer is, 
yes, but I don't have hard data to back that up.

I think I remember reading that W8JI had some data for a fresh water 
proximate BC sight that suggested the lake was somewhere between 15 and 
30 mS/m, but I may be misremembering. I would be real happy with 15 to 
30 mS/m compared to what I have now. I recall that the KS8S/AD8P contest 
station in Deshler Ohio (Northwest region of state) was right in the 
middle of a 15mS/m zone on the FCC conductivity map. From what I 
understand you could dig down a few feet into Dean's yard and hit water. 
It seemed like you could shunt feed a piece of spaghetti there and do 
well on 160.

BTW, even if the muck in your fresh water marsh has improved 
conductivity over dry soil, I wouldn't expect that to obviate the need 
for a good radial system. Copper is still a many many orders of 
magnitude better conductor than even saltwater. I would expect the main 
benefit of the mucky soil to be a positive impact on the psuedo Brewster 
angle.

73, Mike W4EF.............

>With all due respect to other posters,
>most of the comments have been anecdotal in nature and do not reflect any
>scientific measurements of performance.
>
>I have done any number of searches from Terman to Laport and Google and can
>find nothing that touts locating an antenna in fresh water to enhance
>performance.
>
>73 Craig
>
>
>Craig Clark K1QX
>Radioware
>PO Box 209
>Rindge NH 03461
>603 899 6957
>  
>


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>