Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor for Long Cable Run

To: "TOWERTALK@contesting.com" <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor for Long Cable Run
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 22:26:02 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On Sun, 10 May 2009 20:18:48 -0400, john@kk9a.com wrote:

>I would be more concerned about whether the SteppIR will work properly 
>with that long of a run.

Hi John,

Thanks. I'm concerned too. FWIW, I am disgusted with the mfrs of all of these 
products, including SteppIR, for not publishing specifications for what is 
essentially a simple Ohm's law problem that all of their customers need to 
solve when doing due diligence. It is a very simple matter to specify the 
currents involved, the output of the controller, any adjustment that is built 
into the controller, and the IR drop that can be tolerated. Starting current?  
Fine. Specify it. 

I'm told that SteppIR cable is paired, but there's no indication of which 
conductors are pairs. In fact, if I wanted to order my own #18 rather than use 
their #22, I wouldn't know that from reading their documentation. BTW -- if 
their cable is a foil shield with drain wire, that drain wire can couple RF 
shield current onto the signal pair by a mechanism called Shield-Current-
Induced Noise. 

Ohms Law still works. Give us the data on the product so we can use it!   

73,

Jim Brown K9YC


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>