By putting two relays in series, don't you create a situation where there would
be a voltage breakdown nearest the RF, and then a second voltage breakdown/arc
at the second relay?
I guess I'm not seeing how two in series increases voltage handling, as to me
it would seem that the relay with RF on one side is still the same size and as
prone to arcing at a given voltage.
However, isn't voltage at a minimum at the end of a full-sized 1/4 wave
radiator (half of a dipole) and current at a maximum?
Art
--- On Wed, 5/20/09, Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> wrote:
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MACAntenna
To: "bill rubin" <brubin2010@gmail.com>
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 10:19 AM
They say that they modified the design after the QST article to put
two relays in series, thereby raising the voltage handling
capacity. They now claim 1500 watts RTTY key down on all bands.
It's not really loops, but rather ladder line segments where one line
carries the control pulses and the other serves as the antenna. The
DC is separated out at the magic box in the center. To their credit,
they are very open about schematics and the like.
73, Pete N4ZR
At 10:44 AM 5/20/2009, you wrote:
>The antenna I saw at dayton looks like ladder line loops for each
>element with relays along each element to close the loops for each
>band selected. This is done with a relay control box. Seems to be a
>good idea but there is always compromise. Relay failures and parts
>with each board, control box and power output limitations.
>
>On 5/20/09, Arthur Trampler <atrampler@att.net> wrote:
> > duh me...
> >
> > --- On Wed, 5/20/09, Dubovsky, George
<George.Dubovsky@andrew.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Dubovsky, George <George.Dubovsky@andrew.com>
> > Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] MACAntenna
> > To: "Arthur Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>, "Pete
Smith"
> > <n4zr@contesting.com>, towertalk@contesting.com, "Brian
Gieryk"
> > <ke6iyc@mac.com>
> > Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 8:47 AM
> >
> > Probably a typo in your email, Art, but I presume you meant feet,
> not inches
> > ;-)
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > geo - n4ua
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> > [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Arthur
Trampler
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:43 AM
> > To: Pete Smith; towertalk@contesting.com; Brian Gieryk
> > Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MACAntenna
> >
> > That's easy Brian.
> >
> > If the boom to mast is at the center of the boom, then one has
10.25" on
> > that side of the right triangle; 17.333 inches on the other side of
the
> > right
> > triange; and 20.13" turning radius.
> >
> > Art
> >
> > --- On Wed, 5/20/09, Brian Gieryk <ke6iyc@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Brian Gieryk <ke6iyc@mac.com>
> > Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MACAntenna
> > To: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com>,
> > towertalk@contesting.com
> > Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 8:11 AM
> >
> > Perhaps a typo on their site, or an oversight, but how cane one have
a
> > turning radius (20 ft, 1 in.) LESS than the boom length (20 ft, 6
in.)?
> >
> > Brian
> > KE6IYC
> >
> > On May 20, 2009, at 4:41 AM, Pete Smith wrote:
> >
> >> This year at Dayton, there was a vendor (www.mactenna.net)
> >> demonstrating something called the SB20-10 Simple Beam. The
basic
> >> principle was described in a QST article in September 2008,
applied
> >> to a wire dipole, and I remember at the time thinking
"You've
> > gotta
> >> be kidding." Now, however, the inventor has incorporated
the idea
> > in
> >> a 3-element yagi, and unless he has cooked the books, the EZNEC
> >> models look pretty good. On all 5 bands between 20 and 10
meters,
> >> the models show very similar pattern and gain numbers and
excellent
> >> SWR bandwidth, all without motors, moving parts (other than relay
> >> contacts), and at a decently low price.
> >>
> >> The manufacturer's web site is very forthcoming with
information,
> >> which tends to inspire confidence. Still, I'd appreciate
hearing
> >> what the gurus among us think.
> >>
> >> 73, Pete N4ZR
> >> New Articles Daily - the Contesting Compendium at
> > http://wiki.contesting.com
> >> The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at
> > www.conteststations.com
> >> The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> TowerTalk mailing list
> >> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This message is for the designated recipient only and may
> > contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> > If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> > immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
> > this email is prohibited.
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [mf2]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
>
>--
>Sent from my mobile device
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|