Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC antenna modeling forum has been created on Yahoo

To: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC antenna modeling forum has been created on Yahoo
From: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:10:34 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I found this exchange very useful, actually.

Besides, somebody had a question, their google-fu failed them and they got
fixed up.  Don't see the problem here.

Furthermore, speaking as someone who has tried his hand at "NEC"
documentation, I find it one of the least informative interfaces on the
planet whether "EZ" or the others.  This is one case where RTFM was _not_
helpful.

Me, I'm off to the various fora where maybe I can learn, among other
things, _how_ to read that manual.  Maybe if you already have a Ph D in
antenna theory, the manual is a snap.

But, I don't, so it isn't.


Larry Wo0Z
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>wrote:

> On 2/24/2013 9:37 AM, SPWoo wrote:
>
>> I'm new to antenna modeling and I have lots of questions.  I looked for a
>> user group for EZNEC but couldn't find one.
>>
>
> Pardon me for asking, but why not study the EZNEC Manual, the ARRL
> Handbook chapters on antennas, and the ARRL Antenna Book? Also, ARRL sells
> a beginner's book on antenna modeling, written by Ward Silver, N0AX. I
> haven't seen it, but everything else of his I've ever seen has been first
> rate.
>
> Most of us don't mind answering a question that is the result of study and
> working through a problem, or correct the misinformation and myths that
> seem to abound and be perpetuated by folks who know nothing. But an email
> reflector is not a substitute for putting nose to grindstone and STUDYING
> the fundamentals.
>
> Ham radio is a TECHNICAL hobby. We have our frequencies because we
> supposed to be a pool of trained communicators, a breeding ground for
> future technical people, and experimenters who might actually advance the
> state of the art.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> ______________________________**_________________
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/towertalk<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk>
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>