Welll...Yah, usually, maybe. I agree, regardless of the SWR reading, it
is no indicator as to how well the antenna is working. Period!
Is this a new antenna with the 30 meter add on, or an A3WS that was up
and has had the 30 meter element added? It makes a big difference!
IF OTOH, and I emphasize the "IF" an antenna has been up and working and
Then the SWR goes up. or DOWN then and only then it's a good indicator
that "something" has gone wrong in the antenna system. It does not tell
how well the antenna is working. An AIM is an improvement, over plain
SWR and can tell the Op a lot more "about" the antenna. System can be
almost anything on either end of the feed line, or the feed line itself.
As individuals, we tend to use the "shotgun" approach to
troubleshooting, jumping from what ever we think it might be to the next
"might be", instead of using a structured approach. Much depends on
what has transpired between when the antenna was last known to work and
when it was discovered that it didn't work.
If this is a new antenna, I agree with Jim and say, use the
Manufacturer's recommended balun. Don't complicate matters by changing
things before knowing the antenna works.
In most cases checking the last thing changed is where we start with a
careful visual inspection. Then check connections, but in this case it
appears to me that both the 30 meter add on and the balun are new.
Often and I mean "really often", our approach to troubleshooting makes
things worse. I say that as having spent nearly 26 years in Industrial
instrumentation (maintenance) where I've seen most any mistake made that
can be made and I made a lot of them. I've also been a ham since
spring of 61 (over 54 years).
Technically(and I know Jim already knows this) the word Balun is a
contraction for BALanced to UNbalanced. All other uses are a misuse of
the word, but like DeepFreeze (I'll bet a lot have to look that up),
misuse of the word has caused it to lose its original meaning, so, as
you said, when we read Balun, the writer may mean one of many things.
IOW, Balun is now accepted as a generic term for almost any device
between the feed line and the antenna.
One added note. 12 to 15 foot spacing is the distance I used to mount
my 7L 6-meter C3i above the old TH-5. It sounds really close for the
A3WS and the tribander.
It "sounds" to me as if the problem is spacing. As for the balun, if
you have one, test it before doing all that extra work.
73
Roger (K8RI)
On 11/10/2015 4:51 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
I don't think it's coax, I think it's simply interaction between
antennas and Les's misunderstanding of the importance of SWR as an
indicator of antenna performance.
Repeat after me --
SWR is NOT an indicator of antenna performance.
SWR is NOT an indicator of antenna performance.
SWR is NOT an indicator of antenna performance.
SWR is NOT an indicator of antenna performance.
SWR is NOT an indicator of antenna performance.
SWR is NOT an indicator of antenna performance.
SWR is NOT an indicator of antenna performance.
SWR is NOT an indicator of antenna performance.
OTOH -- the "balun" used should be exactly what the antenna designer
recommends. The word "balun" is used to describe (at least) a dozen
different things that are VERY different from each other. The
operation of the antenna, as well as the match between antenna and
feedline can be greatly affected by which is used.
So -- study the instructions for the antenna, use exactly with the mfr
recommends, and if you want to minimize RX noise, ADD a common mode
choke on the coax side of the mfr's recommended matching device, as
described in by Cookbook. k9yc.com/RFI-Ham.pdf
73, Jim K9YC
On Tue,11/10/2015 1:38 PM, Les Kalmus wrote:
Chris,
I had a similar problem that turned out to be the coax. It leaves the
top of the tower over an arm, then hangs. The center conductor
migrated at the top of the arm.
I had to cut that section out and remounted everything but hung the
coax from the arm with a cable grip from McMaster. No problems since.
From your description, you should probably recheck the coax and make
sure there are no points where there is pressure that could cause the
center to migrate and change as the tower is raised.
Les w2LK
On 11/10/2015 12:54 PM, Chris Wynn via TowerTalk wrote:
OK, see if this changes any opinions. When I put up the A3WS at the
towers nested height of about 30 feet, 12 meters swr was flat, 30
meters was flat, and 17 meters was around 1.8:1....
Now, with the A3WS MOUNTED OVER THE th-7, 12 METERS is 1.8:1, 30
meters is 3.1:1, and 17 meters is 1.0:1........
I have the A3WS mounted about 10 to 12 feet above the TH-7. While
talking to Mark at DX Eng., he brought up the issue of spacing
between the TH-7 and the A3WS..... Originally, I thought that the 10
to 12 feet of space between the two would be enough. However, at
this point, I HAVE NO CLUE! Would it be worth moving the TH-7 above
the A3WS?????
While coming home for lunch, I worked the 5Z4 on 17 meters with the
tower nested.... Hell if I know at this point!!!
AS TO THE QUESTIONS ON HOW I MEASURED THE SWR, I have used both the
MFJ 259 and the radio's (FT-1000 field) and get the same
measurements.... And have measured the swr at the end of the coax
connected to the balun on the yagi.....
The TH-7 is working just fine......
I appreciate all of the help and advice...My XYL is livid with me as
I have been totally consumed with these problems, and as much as I
like RF, I LIKE "THAT" better and don't want to end up divorced;)
Chris
Christopher L. Wynn
Attorney-at-Law
Christopher L. Wynn, ESQ., P.C.
8473 Earl D. Lee, Suite 300
Douglasville, Ga., 30134
(770)942-8661 (Landline)
(770)577-1626 (Telecopier)
chris@chriswynnlaw.com
On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 10:40 AM, "K7LXC@aol.com"
<K7LXC@aol.com> wrote:
> Last week I had the antenna back on the ground and
disassembled every trap on it, and found nothing out of the
ordinary. ? So what was the swr when it was on the ground? Did
you check it? You need to first ascertain that your antenna
looks like an antenna; i.e. it has a dip somewhere. Put your antenna
analyzer on the antenna and work your way back from there. BTW
many times an "antenna problem" turned out to be something in the
shack; e.g. coax jumper, coax switch, etc. Cheers & GL,Steve
K7LXCTOWER TECH
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
--
73
Roger (K8RI)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|