In my opinion, and in general, turning/braking torque as a spec makes
more sense than surface area. In theory, with normal winds, surface
area of a perfectly balanced antenna would have little to do with with
how strong a rotator would be required to turn it. Mass and length
would be far more relevant.
However, in my somewhat unique case, balance and mass of the antenna
isn't all that relevant ... but rated torque of the rotator still is. I
live on a hillside that blocks the normal flow of wind, and I get these
monster swirlers that roar down the hillside as the wind is forced to
come around the ridge line. I've measured them at over 100 mph on a
clear day and I watched one literally lift my 16 year old son about two
feet off the ground. When one of those hits my tower straight on the
forces on the boom ADD UP and put incredible torque on the rotator. I
have a PST-61D with stripped gears to prove it, and the total surface
area of my antennas (OB16-3 and OB2-40) is less than 20 sq ft. The
gears were stripped while in a resting state.
I was going to upgrade to a PST-71D or even PST-110D, but WA7NB's litany
of woe with two different PST-110D's (Hall effect pulse detector issues,
I think) has me leaning more toward a prop pitch. The gears on the Smart
GE 2500 NS Rotator by Giovannini look totally awesome but it appears to
use an AC motor, and that would involve a permit process I'm not anxious
to pursue.
At the moment I'm still considering what I'm going to do.
73,
Dave AB7E
On 5/3/2016 9:39 AM, Jerry Gardner wrote:
Is there a better way to determine if a rotator can handle an antenna based
on its size rather than just its wind area? Lots of people here have
recommended the M2 Orion 2800, which on paper is rated for 35 sqft, but
when I asked the tower installer who will be putting the antenna up whether
he thought the Orion could handle the OB17-4, he said that antenna will
tear an Orion up and strip the gears on the output shaft in short order.
The OB17-4 has a 39' boom, 17 elements, of which the longest is 48', and
weighs 220 pounds. I've noticed that some rotators don't list a sqft rating
at all, but give turning and braking torque in Nm. Is there a way to
calculate how many Nm would be required to rotate an antenna and keep it in
place? I do have an RT-21 controller, which has slow ramp-up/ramp-down to
ease the load on the rotator by starting and stopping it slowly.
The various vendors aren't much help with this as they all say their
rotators will handle the load, while at the same time saying their
competitor's product won't.
73, Jerry
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:13 PM, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote:
On 4/26/16 11:46 AM, Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H wrote:
PST-61D has 39sqft.
The one thing that still concerns me about the Orion, however, is that
it's
only rated to 35 sqft. The OB17-4 is 27 sqft, so there's not a lot of
margin there.
It's not clear to me what a "square foot" rating for a rotator would be..
Inertia loads would be in some sort of mass *length^2.
Square foot would be for wind drag forces: Unless you're talking about
the "side" (radial) load on the bearings (which depends a LOT on the mast
length and whether there's other bearings or mounting points.
But for "turning in the wind", you'd need to know an area and a radius
from the axis of rotation to turn that into a torque (e.g. will it
overpower the brake or rip the teeth off the gears).
Maybe they're using "square feet" as a shorthand for "size of antenna and
polar moment of inertia". Square feet cross section is given for most
antennas, polar moment is not. Since most antennas are fairly similar in
construction, knowing cross sectional area (square feet) probably
correlates well with overall size and mass.
(unless you use solid steel bar as your boom, and silver plated steel bars
for the elements. <grin>)
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|