Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover
From: "Mike Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 21:58:43 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
It's not an instruction manual. It's a monthly publication of advertisements
with some articles thrown in on the side. Look past the subtle shortcomings
and enjoy the fact that someone under 65 is even shown in or on the
magazine.   '73, -Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ed
Sawyer
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 3:26 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover

I think that given how fundamentally important antennas and towers are to
ham radio, the lack of anyone who knows what they are looking at reviewing
the picture for proper safety procedures is unexcusable.  It's the cover for
cripes sake.

 

The ARRL is not a volunteer organization.  The staffers are paid and we pay
for the publication and services.  People treating this like it's a mistake
in a club newsletter are way off base.  It's a national paid publication.

 

73

 

Ed  N1UR

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>