On 9/29/2025 11:11 PM, Michael Tope wrote:
Dave,
Say you have a dipole up 50ft and you have some common-mode current on
the coax shield (perhaps the choke at the feed point is not very good or
worse yet, there isn't one). If you bond the coax shield to an 8ft
ground rod at the point where the coax reaches the ground, you will
create a circuit path for RF current to flow that is in parallel with
the shield of the coax leading back toward the transmitter. Now an 8 ft
ground rod (depending on soil properties) isn't a very good RF ground,
so the amount of RF current that is shunted there might not be much, but
it won't be zero. Moreover, if I start attaching radials to that ground
rod the RF impedance of that grounding point will drop and more of that
shield current will be diverted away from the shield leading back to the
transmitter.> > Lightning protection is, at least in part, about shunting fast
rise-time
currents either from direct hits or induced currents from nearby
strokes. The other part is about having everything in the electrical
system bonded to a common point so the voltage on everything rises
together during the stroke (potential difference is the enemy). Bleeding
of static charge is related, but not the same thing (that may save your
receiver front-end). If you look at the spectrum of a lightning stroke
there is a lot of energy in the MW and HF bands. A robust RF ground
should make a good lightning ground and vice versa). Seems like there is
also (at least with a direct hit) a DC component since there is a net
movement of charge. I've always wondered about the insulated THHN in the
radial system for my HF vertical and the DC component. Perhaps that's
where the ground rods come in :-).
Some thoughts on this. First, not only is that rod not a very good RF
ground, it often isn't even a good conductor at DC and power
frequencies. Here in the Santa Cruz mountains, I've measured in the
range of 30K ohms DC for ~ 550 ft distance between the two ends of one
of my Beverages, realizing that it includes termination resistance.
I've measured more than 1K ohms at DC between two driving rods roughly
15 feet apart by my tower (before connecting them to the tower). Another
observation. When Ward and I were working on his Power and Grounding
book, we agreed that the common mode path between a tower and a shack is
an inductor, and that there is no good reason for lightning safety to
bond the tower to the premises ground system. There IS, however, a
requirement to bond anything at that tower connected to mains power.
All of this long ago caused me to see the purpose of the best practical
ground at the tower, combined with that inductive path to the premises
as shunting some of that that HF energy in lightning to ground.
I agree that radials will add some capacity coupling to the earth, but
it's distributed capacitance connected by wire that is behaving as part
of an antenna, and current distribution is like on any other part of an
antenna.
The late Henry Ott taught in his EMC workshops that above a few kHz, the
impedance of a conductor with even a very large cross sectional area is
dominate by inductance.
I recall a wonderful demo at a Chicago IEEE EMC workshop that connected
an HP generator and voltmeter by 10 ft or so of RG58, and bonded both
generator and voltmeter to a wide metal plate. There ammeters in series
with the shield and the plate. At DC, all the current was in the plate,
but by mid-frequency audio, an increasing fraction of the current was in
the coax shield, and by 10 kHz or so, there was no current in the plate.
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|