VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Operator versus technology

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Operator versus technology
From: k1ep@mgef.org (Ed K1EP)
Date: Fri Jul 25 06:07:34 2003
At 11:56 PM 7/24/03 -0500, Tree wrote:

>> Use the strategy or don't.  The ARRL says it's fine.  Come on in, the water's
>> warm! :)
>
>Ev-
>
>I like CW a lot.  However, I realize it isn't for everyone.  I don't
>keep trying to pretend that everyone should like it.
>
>Tree

I have been reading a lot of this discussion.  Let me preface my remarks with 
the following:

o I have not used CU2QSO
o I have read the demo webpage and believe I understand its operation
o I have nothing to do with its creation or affiliated with its author

There seems to be a religious war going on here.  Both sides seem to have their 
beliefs.  As an outsider here, let me make several observations.

o CU2QSO is a simplex mode, no digis or repeaters are used.
o CU2QSO to me is the digital equivalent of calling "CQ CONTEST W2EV FN12".
o A computer is necessary to decode CU2QSO, PSK31, WSJT, and RTTY messages.
o CU2QSO, PSK31, WSJT and RTTY are valid digital modes in a contest.
o Many operators use a liason frequency to schedule microwave contacts, just as 
10M was used to sked 6M contacts, etc.
o Many operators pass QSOs to other bands either on their liason frequencies or 
on frequencies used for QSOs and CQs.

I understand the aversion to packet and spotting.  I operate most HF contests 
SOLP and don't use packet.  The only time I use packet is when I have to while 
I am operating at someone else's HF multi-op station.  Packet isn't for 
everyone and it isn't for me.  But it exists and as a SOLP contester, I have 
learned how to use it to my advantage.  And if anyone is confused by that, try 
contesting SOLP sometime.  But I digress.  I don't use CU2QSO either.  To me, 
it just seems like another way of calling CQ on a common liason frequency.  
What is wrong with that analogy?  

I don't think that 6M is that dead these days that we have to spend so much of 
our time discussing this. 

>_______________________________________________
>VHFcontesting mailing list
>VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is a PRIVATE communication. This email may 
contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the 
above-named 
recipient. If you have received this in error and you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, or copying is 
strictly prohibited. In such case, do not read, copy, or use it, and do not 
disclose 
it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this
message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>