To: | VHF Contesting e-Mail List <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] No Controversy for The ARRL 10 GHz and AboveContest? |
From: | Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:39:41 -0700 (PDT) |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
--- Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org> wrote: > The 10 GHz contest is quite different from any other > contest. For one thing, the number of stations > available is usually limited. But that can be said for a group of west Texas rovers, too. Why the outcry over grid circling in VHF contests, but no controversy in the 10-GHz contest where ratios of 10 loggings per callsign were celebrated as an accomplishment? Again...I'm asking out of curiosity. I'm not complaining in the least. Ev, W2EV ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] What cost and expected benefit to compete?, Radiosporting Fan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] W2EV Plans: The ARRL 10 GHz and Above Contest, Radiosporting Fan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] No Controversy for The ARRL 10 GHz and AboveContest?, Zack Widup |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] No Controversy for The ARRL 10 GHz and AboveContest?, Zack Widup |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |