VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] No Controversy for The ARRL 10 GHz and AboveContest?

To: VHF Contesting e-Mail List <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] No Controversy for The ARRL 10 GHz and AboveContest?
From: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:40:34 -0500 (CDT)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
In all except the UHF contest, those West Texas rovers can work a very 
large area on 6 meters.  Much larger than they could on 10 GHz.

Zack W9SZ


On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Radiosporting Fan wrote:

> --- Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org> wrote:
> 
> > The 10 GHz contest is quite different from any other
> > contest.  For one thing, the number of stations
> > available is usually limited.
> 
> But that can be said for a group of west Texas rovers,
> too.  Why the outcry over grid circling in VHF
> contests, but no controversy in the 10-GHz contest
> where ratios of 10 loggings per callsign were
> celebrated as an accomplishment?
> 
> Again...I'm asking out of curiosity.  I'm not
> complaining in the least.
> 
> Ev, W2EV
> 

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>