VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] No Controversy for The ARRL 10 GHz andAboveContest?

To: "Zack Widup" <w9sz@prairienet.org>,"VHF Contesting e-Mail List" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] No Controversy for The ARRL 10 GHz andAboveContest?
From: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:55:03 -0000
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
But how much Eskip do we generally get in the Jan or Sept contests?  And
10ghz requires a much smaller antenna for going to the moon.

73s John NE0P

----- Original Message -----
From: "Zack Widup" <w9sz@prairienet.org>
To: "VHF Contesting e-Mail List" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] No Controversy for The ARRL 10 GHz and
AboveContest?


>
> In all except the UHF contest, those West Texas rovers can work a very
> large area on 6 meters.  Much larger than they could on 10 GHz.
>
> Zack W9SZ
>
>
> On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Radiosporting Fan wrote:
>
> > --- Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org> wrote:
> >
> > > The 10 GHz contest is quite different from any other
> > > contest.  For one thing, the number of stations
> > > available is usually limited.
> >
> > But that can be said for a group of west Texas rovers,
> > too.  Why the outcry over grid circling in VHF
> > contests, but no controversy in the 10-GHz contest
> > where ratios of 10 loggings per callsign were
> > celebrated as an accomplishment?
> >
> > Again...I'm asking out of curiosity.  I'm not
> > complaining in the least.
> >
> > Ev, W2EV
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>