VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Propoer use of Call Frequencies

To: "Radiosporting Fan" <radiosporting@yahoo.com>,vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Propoer use of Call Frequencies
From: "crawfish" <crawfish@surfmore.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 13:38:33 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
4 meter band sounds good, except for those pesky Channel 4 and 5 TV
transmitters:-). I understand that there was mention of an 8 meter band
being considered, since lots of commercial folks were vacating low-band VHF
for UHF. Maybe a band without contests? Use of 144.200 during contests is
not the issue, the use of it for ragchewing hours and hours(before,during,
and after contests) is the issue.
                              Joe W4AAB
----- Original Message -----
From: "Radiosporting Fan" <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Propoer use of Call Frequencies


> > 1. What is the current suggested protocol for using
> > the call frequencies in contest now and why does it
> > not work?
>
> The current protocol is one in which you maximize your
> score by operating as competitively as you can without
> alienating the fellow competitors on which you rely in
> order to maximize that score.
>
> The only call-frequency that is "banned" is 146.520 FM
> simplex.  The intent was to assure that the FM
> contingent who was not interested in contesting (gasp!
> <g>) had a safe haven to park their transceivers on,
> squelched and enjoy their hobby interests.
>
> /opinion on/
> It is beyond me as to why this issue (banning 144.200
> for contest contacts) is being discussed.  It is
> counterproductive on too many levels to discuss in a
> single email.
>
> I will be inviting my Atlantic Division Director to
> consider two items: (1) the exploring the
> establishment of a "4-meter" band in the USA (for the
> same reason that 60 meters was created) -and- (2)
> establishing a committee to review *all* contest
> rules, weeding out those that no longer make sense and
> clarifying those items that are perrennial points of
> confusion.
> /opinion off/
>
> Others will certainly chime-in on your other items.
>
> Regards,
> Ev, W2EV
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>