| To: | frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] rover tech - coax |
| From: | "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com> |
| Reply-to: | mike@ka5cvh.com |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:33:24 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
frank bechdoldt wrote: > The problem with LMR 400 thats not flexable is the fact that its not > flexable. Mike wrote Truer words were never spoken. Actually for a short run mobile I'd just go with the LMR-240 flex especially on 50/144/222/432. Mike Urich KA5CVH http://ka5cvh.com EC - S/E Harris Co. http://harriscountyares.org _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] rover tech - coax, frank bechdoldt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] June Log Submission, Dave Agsten |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] rover tech - coax, frank bechdoldt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] rover tech - coax, Eric Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |