| To: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [VHFcontesting] roving check logs |
| From: | frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:10:24 -0800 |
| List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
I suppose all contacts over 30 could be sent in a check log as to not to punish a rover who has less than 30 vs a rover who has more than 30 contacts. _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_howitworks_022009 _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] KC2QZF/R Response to Current Issues, Mark Adams, PE |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] roving check logs, Steve Clifford |
| Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] KC2QZF/R Response to Current Issues, Mark Adams, PE |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] roving check logs, Steve Clifford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |