Hi Ron,
Perhaps I shouldn't have said "large". Of course, nothing has been settled as
to rules, but the general feeling out there is that 6-character grids would be
used for the report. If that were the case, then it probably would not be a big
deal, as long as all the contests were run the same way. If they weren't, then
there would probably be confusion at each running of a contest, resulting in
extra workload at the contest desk, getting things straightened out. Also, I
would think that the Cabrillo file would have to be modified and a calculator
function added to compute points for each contact.
I can understand a desire for a change of pace. You might be right about
assigning more points for each distant contact. But, that wouldn't cause me to
work harder to get distant stations. I work hard to get the distant stations
now.
I have not worked any distance scoring contests outside of the Stew Perry. I
liked the SP because the exchange was not a "given." You actually had to copy
the guy's grid locator. This might be a good point for those in favor of
distance based contests with 6-character grids as the exchange. It might not be
for others. For instance, while it might be easy enough to copy DELTA NOVEMBER
ONE THREE from here in CN87, as it is now, copying DELTA NOVEMBER ONE THREE
MIKE GOLF might not be.
I guess I'm resistant to change. I'm happy with the contests the way they are
now. I wouldn't fight a change, though.
73,
Paul, K7CW
--- On Sun, 2/15/09, Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net> wrote:
From: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] psyched out
To: k7cw@yahoo.com
Cc: "VHF Contesting Reflector" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Sunday, February 15, 2009, 9:24 PM
Hi Paul
Can you help me to understand why you think the work load would increase on the
sponsors for distance scoring?
I didn't think we are actually talking about a new set of rules only the way
the score is compiled for the contacts. Isn't that correct?
I don't know what the scoring results will be since I have never operated a VHF
distance scoring contest. I have operated the Stew Perry challenge on 160 cw
and enjoyed it. After operating various HF and VHF contest for 39 years with
similar traditional scoring formats, changing to VHF distance scoring might be
fun.
I don't think distance scoring is actually about who is going to be the new
winners when it is all over. However, I can see that working several stations
in a dx grid in an opening will count the same for each contact using distance
scoring, instead of just another point after the initial contact using grid
multipliers. Many contesters are dxers at heart and may like the idea of
getting rewarded with extra points for each dx contact.
Have you operated a distance scoring contest? If so, was it more fun?
Ron W4WA
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com> wrote:
Frank,
You didn't have to take that quote out of context, but it still applies. Your
other enhancement didn't help you, either.
In an indirect way, I addressed the "situation" in California. But, since you
decided to broach the subject directly, here is my reply: Nobody is breaking
any rules. In my opinion, the ARRL is off beat by having a word like "intent"
in the rules. There should be no interpretation going on. Having someone decide
whether there is intent or not is ridiculous, in my opinion. Apparently, the
interpretations arrived at by the group in Califonia is different from yours.
Beyond that, they won their categories in the contest by following the rules
and were not disqualified. I told you before, that if I had the resources, I
would get a crew together myself to take Wayne and his bunch on. As you can
see, I don't have a problem with Wayne and his methods of winning. Ask yourself
if you thought that you would place first in the US if they didn't. If the
answer is yes, then get set up to beat them next time. If the answer is no,
then you have no beef since you are not
in the same ARRL division.
As far as the distance scoring thing goes, I'd rather not change. It would be
change of pace for the competitors but would mean a large increase in workload
for the sponsors. I think the winners of contests under the present set of
rules would continue to win under a new set of rules.
Why the HF chick down the street? Wasn't she married to Borat or something? ;-)
73,
Paul, K7CW
--- On Sun, 2/15/09, frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com> wrote:
From: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] psyched out
To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Date: Sunday, February 15, 2009, 6:49 PM
A snip from paul, A guy I really do like, becuase he usually makes me think.
"A solution for achieving high esteem: If you find that you probably
won't win, Drop back and consider just having fun by competing with those
whom you have similar circumstances, try to improve on previous scores that
you've made or just have fun in the activity by participating."73,
Paul, K7CWK7CW
Come on Paul, the group in California has no/few peers becasuse the majority of
rovers honor the intent of the ARRL rulemakers who put value in the contest.
Even if I was to take out my brain and say lunchg box/ grid circling roving in
the begining class and traditional class was fair it would not be sportsmanlike
or good for the contest as a whole. The best example is profesional sports with
salary cap. Its done to keep things competive. Would people be interested in
sports if stienbrenner exclusively cloned the best players in baseball history
and the Yankees beat every team for a 100 perent record for the next decade?
People in Boston aLLREADY KNOW HE'S DOING THIS. If the rest of baseball said
it was unethical, would it be wrong for the other teams to address it in a
political manner?
Count me in to help with distance scoring ARRL sponsered or not. ARRl fixes
this issue or not. There needs to be more variety in the VHF bedroom, or we
might have to step out with that HF chick down the street.
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_howitworks_022009
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|