VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] My Proposal to the VUAC

To: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>, vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] My Proposal to the VUAC
From: Dustin <ke5clr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:20:50 -0500
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
I'm very confused by the path this thread has taken. Are we talking 
about calling CQ _/*vs.*/_ using spotting networks, reflectors etc.  
Here I was thinking this was about calling CQ _/*along with*//**/_ using 
spotting networks, reflectors etc.


Duane - N9DG wrote:
> Bottom line is that the top scorers in VHF contests don't just sit still. 
> They call CQ ... a lot. They swing their antennas .... a lot. They scour 
> width swaths of frequencies near continuously. Do we really want to replace 
> all of that with self spotting and Internet coordinated real-time 
> quasi-scheduled Q's? If so, then how does anyone actually find all the 
> various propagation paths and openings?
>
> Duane
> N9DG    
>
>
>       
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>   

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>