My modeling four stacked of 6m loops suggests comparable gain to a 5 element
yogi in all directions with roughly the same takeoff angle with 10' spacing.
What's wrong with that?
Seems to me that the noise problem is there regardless of loop vs. yagi. The
noise on 6 at our contest site is just plain horrible at times with the yagi so
I doubt it could be much worse. That is a problem that Ned's to be resolved
with the power company, nothing else will be as defective.
OK, now I'll stand by for all the apocryphal stories about how your power
monopoly is unresponsive or worse, but I can say that ours has been very
responsive when we tell them where the source is located. Might be due to the
lead engineer being a ham.
I have the loops assembled and just have to finish building the mounts for the
side of the tower. More as it happens...
Regards,
Tom Holmes, N8ZM
Holmes RF Technologies, LLC
937-528-9345
On Sep 17, 2013, at 22:35, Jack W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/17/2013 9:10 PM, K8TB wrote:
>> The main disadvantage of a 4 bay omni is lthat you will pick up any QRN
>> located anywhere. But a 4 bay absolutely has gain on the horizon. A 4 bay
>> would have the proverbial 6 Db of gain, minus splitter/feedline and
>> connector losses. What the 4 bay does is squash the donut flatter, and out.
>> My day job depends on this (radio broadcast engineer with 5 FM transmitter
>> sites).
>> I plan to put up a 4 bay omni for six at my remote base site. Then I
>> switch over to the very quiet Innovative beam.
>> We all should look at more of these antennas, but, to obtain the full 3 Db
>> gain per doubling, you need to space the bays a full wave length, which is
>> 20 feet. So the 4 bay would be 60 feet, bay 1 to bay 4. You can get by with
>> half-wave spacing, with less gain.
>>
>> Tom Bosscher K8TB
> I have never considered a 4-bay for 6, Tom...I know they're way too big...but
> on 2-meters it is a reasonable structure.
>
> As to QRN susceptibility, I believe the predominant component of power line
> noise is vertically polarized, which gives the horizontal loop some immunity.
> I recognize that, as John, AA5FC, pointed out, there is no front-to-back or
> front-to-side rejection to help minimize QRN but the loop stack at least
> allows one to have modest gain in all directions to enhance the probability
> of actually hearing someone otherwise inaudible in the nulls of even a
> smaller yagi.
>
> I usually figure on 2.5db gain per doubling, which is probably a bit
> conservative.
>
> I am a retired radio/TV Chief Engineer with responsibility for an 8-bay Class
> C FM station or two over the years. That was "back in the day" when stations
> actually hired full-time engineers. :>)
>
> 73,
>
> --
> Jack, W6NF/VE4
> Shelley, K7MKL/VE4
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|