It's not harder than running QRP on 160. :-)
73, Zack W9SZ
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jack W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/22/2013 4:02 PM, George Fremin III wrote:
>
> VHF is not harder than HF.
>>
>
> Actually, George, for a "little pistol" in rural Nevada, VHF *is* harder.
> Being a NV mult was generally worth 10db and, with 100 watts, we could, on
> occasion, hold a run frequency in HF contests. A comparable setup on VHF
> doesn't guarantee you can even *be heard* much less work anyone.
>
> 73,
>
> --
> Jack, W6NF/VE4
> Shelley, K7MKL/VE4
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting>
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|