VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Supporting the Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014

To: beamar <beamar@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Supporting the Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:39:53 -0400
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Congress has always had the power to nullify private contracts. States
cannot, local governments cannot, but Congress can.

73,

Paul, N8HM


On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:35 PM, beamar via VHFcontesting <
vhfcontesting@contesting.com> wrote:

> Prohibition in the United States was a nationwide Constitutional ban on
> the sale, production, importation, and transportation of alcohol. The issue
> with the Parity act is different. Here, the Federal Government is (we
> think) going to rule that certain parts of private contracts are now
> illegal. This is good for ham radio. But, it is just another example of how
> the government is getting into more and more aspects of the life of private
> citizens. I have no intention of getting into a political discussion. So, I
> will stop here!
>
> Buddy WB4OMG
>
> On Jul 10, 2014, at 3:16:06 PM, "Floyd Rodgers" <kc5qbc@swbell.net> wrote:
>
> From:   "Floyd Rodgers" <kc5qbc@swbell.net>
> Subject:        Re: [VHFcontesting] Supporting the Amateur Radio Parity
> Act of 2014
> Date:   July 10, 2014 3:16:06 PM EDT
> To:     beamar <beamar@aol.com>
> Didn't the prohibition act do precisely that making alcohol illegal? or
> did it just put forth that untaxed alcohol was illegal?
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>