WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] LPT on 64 bit OS?

To: writelog@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] LPT on 64 bit OS?
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 00:22:25 -0400
List-post: <writelog@contesting.com">mailto:writelog@contesting.com>

As was explained to me the support was discontinued as WIN7 does not
support native LPT ports.

That's not true.  Windows 7 (and Windows 8) - both 32/64 bit versions
support native parallel ports.  I have a couple systems with LPT ports
on the mainboard that are recognized and used by Windows.  However, no
version of Windows from NT on includes a kernel mode driver to permit
port mapped I/O (direct control over the port "bits").  A third party
driver has always been necessary - the difference is that Writelog does
not recognize those drivers where other loggers all appear to have
settled on InpOut32 which works with both 32 and 64 bit systems.


73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 5/4/2013 12:05 AM, Jim Harris wrote:
Hi,
It's my understanding from reading WL help files and corresponding with the 
software developers that it no longer supports LPT ports.  That has been my 
experience as well.  As was explained to me the support was discontinued as 
WIN7 does not support native LPT ports.
It's my experience WIN7 will support plug-in PCI cards that have LPT ports when 
they have their own drivers.  I use this method to support LPT ports on a 
computer running WIN7 when running a different logging program that still 
supports LPT ports.

Take pride in the USA. 73



Jim, W0EM

--- On Fri, 5/3/13, Mark Klocksin <mpklocksin@ameritech.net> wrote:

From: Mark Klocksin <mpklocksin@ameritech.net>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] LPT on 64 bit OS?
To: VK3TDX@aol.com
Cc: k6ll@arrl.net, writelog@contesting.com
Date: Friday, May 3, 2013, 10:48 PM

I think Steve has the right idea.  Parallel ports haven't been seen on new computers 
in…what…10 years?  It seems time to let the technology go.  (That said, I will 
try to hang on to serial ports as long as possible because so much of our ham gear needs 
serial ports.)

Back to your issue, I was surprised to see Steve's tale of woe.  My limited 
experience would tell me an internal card would be recognized by the OS as a 
legitimate LPT port.  And if that is the case, then Writelog should just issue 
requests to the OS, which would instruct the card to behave as we want it to.  
So I think it should work.
And this link says Windows 7 does support LPT ports:
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-hardware/parallel-ports-and-windows-7/6b24de6f-6896-439a-8223-e59985907f68

I said "limited experience" earlier because I have not used an internal LPT port in a 
Windows 7 computer.  However, I DO have a PCMCIA dual-port serial card adapter I use in my Windows 
7 laptop.  That card works fine--in Windows 7 and also in Windows 8 for that matter.  The OS does 
indeed see that as two "real" COM ports.

Best of luck,

73, Mark WA9IVH


On May 3, 2013, at 4:14 PM, VK3TDX@aol.com wrote:

Dave - I spent DAYS trying to get my Win 7 64 bit system to interface  with
a special LPT port card I purchased for my computer for  specifically CW
operation.  Never could get it working even with the tech  supports guys at
the computer shop.  I even have the XP alternate operating  system installed
through Win 7 and still never could do it.

Since I have 2 serial ports available I just gave up on LPT and just wired
up serial for RTTY and CW interface.  Please post your solution if you find
one.
Thanks and good luck
Steve VK3TDX


In a message dated 4/05/2013 3:32:15 A.M. AUS Eastern Standard Time,
k6ll@arrl.net writes:

Does  Writelog support LPT port functions (specifically A/B focus
and CW keying)  on Windows 7 x 64 Bit?

I have a desktop computer running Windows 7 x 64  that I want to
start using as my contest computer.  I have one of  these LPT
thingies on  order:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815201049

Thanks.

Dave  Hachadorian, K6LL
Yuma, Arizona

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing  list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog  on the web:   http://www.writelog.com/

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>