I am in total agreement regarding the use of Writelog. I have been using
Writelog for a long time and I support all the time and effort that has gone
into making it an excellent product. I do not always pay to upgrade because I
am always afraid if I update I will have some kind of problem with the upgrade.
I like to find a good version that does what I like and then use it till a new
upgrade comes along that improves what I do and that is CW contests. Not
interested in phone or RTTY.
I realize that there are other pieces of software that are free and are very
good but I think the guys that have put their heart and soul into something
that I have been using for a long time should be rewarded...and if it costs me
a few bucks, so be it.
Yes I am an old curmudgeon and I don't like to change things but you might be
surprise at how many of us curmudgeons are around!
Bill W5VX
-----Original Message-----
From: WriteLog [mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Anthony
Buscaglia
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 10:48 AM
To: Mike Streeter; Mike Streeter via WriteLog
Cc: Alan Maenchen
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] WriteLog Digest, Vol 160, Issue 8
I apologize for posting my remarks to the reflector. I didnt realize that when
I clicked SEND
What I meant to say is, its difficult to compete" with other "free" software
products with teams of contesters contributing their time and talents to keep
up to date.
Writelog does a great job when it comes to the winners circle. I have many 1st
place certificates for WNY and 2nd district in ARRL DX, CQWW and others to
prove that.
The problem comes in for the occasional contest that pops up on a weekend, and
the modules are not available, are out dated, or dont work properly,
I am not trying to win, just have some fun working a different contest.
I think Writelog is a great piece of software and will keep using it, but if I
want to work a contest that is not supported, I use whatever works for me.
73
Tony
K2NV
> On Apr 11, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Mike Streeter via WriteLog
> <writelog@contesting.com> wrote:
>
> Those of us who used to do paper logging for contests and the fill in dupe
> sheets before we could submit are very well aware of the wonders of Writelog
> and are very thankful for it. Now lets consider various aspects.
> When I first purchased Writelog I read the information which told me which
> contests it supported, and I bought it. The developer got paid, and the
> software worked great (and still does) for the supported contests. Since it
> did not support some contests that I wanted to operate in I downloaded and
> installed a third party software that no-one got paid for and came with the
> risk that it would not work and would never be supported. My choice, not
> Waynes responsibility. The third party guy never got paid and bears no
> responsibility for continued support.
> Likewise, a Contest manager is normally a volunteer who does not receive
> remuneration and has no responsibility to inform software developers of rule
> changes.
> Down here in the deep south we have a habit of adding aftermarket parts to
> our pickups so that we have to have a ladder to get in the cab and we can run
> over alligators on dirt roads without a problem. If the ladder breaks and we
> bust our butts it is not the fault of the vehicle manufacturer. So it is with
> third party software.
> Buy now you will have figured that I know nothing about software, nor do I
> wish to, but as I see it there are a couple of possible solutions, but I do
> not know if they are practical.
> 1) The problem arises because the original software does not have all of the
> contest modules that I want. So can the original software developer write it
> so that downloaded third party software can be easily reprogrammed by someone
> with no programming knowledge to accommodate some changes in contest rules?
> Probably not, I don't know, but it would put the onus for making sure that
> the software scored correctly on the operator who uses third party software.
>
> 2) How about the original program developer doing what Writelog does and
> selling a basic program with a select number of contest modules included, but
> then selling additional contest modules as an upgrade and if contest rules
> change (which does not happen very often) sell a revised version. It is not
> that difficult to keep up with contest rule changes, they are often available
> by checking contest rules in WA7BNM's Contest Calendar months in advance.
> This has the advantage of giving the developer an additional revenue stream
> and allowing the contester to only need to purchase the contest modules that
> he wants. Isn't that what vehicle manufacturers do?
> I can already hear those operators whining about paying for additional
> modules. Get over it, you are probably the same people who have thousands of
> dollars worth of radio and amplifier and bitch about the cost of connectors.
> Writelog is worth every penny and more and if you ever did paper logging you
> would know that.
> Wayne, in spite of my earlier comments about Writelog not scoring correctly
> in a particular contest I fully accept that is my fault (usually I run dummy
> calls before a contest to make sure everything is OK, in this instance I
> didn't and got caught with my pants down) and in no way is a Writelog problem
> but I sure wish we could use Writelog for most contests without having the
> third party software involved.
> 73 to all,
>
> Mike, WM5DX.
>
>
> From: Alan Maenchen <ad6e@arrl.net>
> To: WriteLog Reflector <writelog@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 1:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] WriteLog Digest, Vol 160, Issue 8
>
> I'm with Wayne on this issue.
>
> If a contest changes the rules, then blame the contest manager who
> changed the rule.. Don't blame Wayne or WL for not having ESP.
>
> Part of being a contest manager (been there, done that) is reaching
> out and maintaining a good relationship with the software vendors that
> support your event. Failure to do that results in this sort of problem.
>
> If YOU know of a rule change for your favorite contest, then YOU need
> to verify, and say something BEFORE you use it in that changed
> contest. If you automatically assume things will always be rose petals
> in your path, you're likely to be tripped up a lot by hidden roots.
>
> 73, Alan AD6E
>
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 04:50:48 +0000
>> From: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
>> To: w5xd@writelog.com
>> Cc: "[WriteLog]" <writelog@contesting.com>
>> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] ok-om contest
>> Message-ID:
>> <CALBVtwHQjqV-6SHL=pHQPCSWxv1UePEF+EJ9Ucg_=
>> ST3knM4vA@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> A lot of us have kept the faith with WL for a long time and for good
>> reason. WL is an excellent contest logger but keeping abreast of
>> contest rules with so many events in the annual calendar is clearly
>> proving to be a significant challenge.
>>
>> I have done rather well in contests with WL and hope I can continue
>> to do so but I feel it is getting harder. A month back I raised
>> concerns over the scoring irregularities associated with the Russian
>> DX Contest. These turned out to be the same concerns reported two
>> years earlier, which went unaddressed and ended up with at least one
>> high profile contester switching permanently to an alternative
>> logging package. Following my note re RDX others wrote saying they
>> suffered the same problems but felt there was little interest in
>> fixing them. I confess I found their opinions hard to counter given
>> my observations received no acknowledgement, let alone any commitment
>> they would be addressed. Scoring in the RDX module has been
>> incorrect for at least 3 years now. This is way too long.
>> Particularly so when RDX is one of the major events in the annual contest
>> calendar and for the last two years a WRTC 2018 qualifying event.
>>
>> I would dearly love to see WL top of the pile in contest logging but
>> it really can't be when modules for even major contests don't reflect
>> current rules.
>>
>> 73 Bob, 5B4AGN
>>
>> On 11 April 2016 at 02:46, Wayne, W5XD <w5xd@writelog.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> The problem is the Wayne can?t be a one man show and keep up with
>>>> all
>> the
>>>> contests. The third party guys have stopped developing and we
>>>> users who paid for the sofware are left holding the bag. N1MM has
>>>> a bunch of active contesters who keep things up to day. Very hard
>>>> to compete with. I feel bad for the WL developers and team, but
>>>> that?s progress.
>>>
>>> Golly. One or two modules get out of date and you're ready to throw
>>> in the towel? I am not.
>>>
>>> The problem with keeping up with rules changes, in my opinion, is
>>> more with finding out about rule changes than it is with getting the
>>> updates out. The old adage that, "if you want a job done right, you
>>> have to do it yourself" means that the WL team needs to make a
>>> better effort watching for rule changes--we are obviously guilty as
>>> charged. But I hope you'll also understand that posting complaints
>>> to the reflector the day after the contest in question ends (as was
>>> done to start this
>>> thread) might not be the optimum time or method to let the WL team know.
>>>
>>>> Very hard to compete with.
>>> it depends on what you mean by competition. WL users are still
>>> winning contests.
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|