RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs
From: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Reply-to: dave@nk7z.net
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:06:15 -0800
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
I must agree with you here!  I have always had good response from the
FCC when I did my homework.  They have resolved a very bad RFI isue, and
in very short order...

I believe it is all about doing the homework to have as airtight a case
as possible when you contact them...  This includes logs, notes, and
recordings...

-- 
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info
for MM-SSTV see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MM-SSTV/info


On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 07:39 -0800, Kimberly Elmore wrote:
> If no one complains, it's a sure bet nothing good will ever happen. Are we at 
> the top of the FCC's interest list? No, nor have we ever been. Yet, if we 
> don't squawk, who will? We need to log the problems with the FCC and with the 
> ARRL, who (like it or not) has a fair bit more clout with the FCC than any 
> one of us singly. 
> 
> My experience with the FCC field offices has always been good. If there's a 
> problem, call the closest office and ask to speak to a field engineer. These 
> guys are pretty bright and understand what we do. 
> 
> I honestly don't understand the attitude of  "It's hopeless so don't bother." 
> That's a self-fulfilling prophecy if ever there was one. 
> 
> Kim N5OP
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: Dale J. <dj2001x@comcast.net>
> To: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com> 
> Cc: "rfi@contesting.com List" <rfi@contesting.com> 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 9:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs
>  
> 
> Hi Roger,
> 
> Now that statement I'll agree with.  I will too.  
> 
> Even if I were to call the FCC to complain would I talk to a live human who 
> knows what I'm talking about or would it be a robot that directs me to a FAQ 
> on how to deal with RFI.  
> 
> 73
> Dale, K9vuj
> 
> 
> On 12, Feb 2014, at 8:12, Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> 
> > Unfortunately, interference to amateur radio appears to be VERY low
> > on the FCC priorities list. I'll probably be an SK long before they
> > act on my complaint!
> > 
> > 73, Roger
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > RFI mailing list
> > RFI@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>