Had intended to post to the forum... sent directly to Ed by mistake!
Thank you Ed for the personal response. Hope you don't mind my posting it.
73, Jim W4QE
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [RFI] DEFINITION OF "HARMFUL INTERFERENCE"
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 13:49:48 +0000
From: Hare, Ed, W1RFI <w1rfi@arrl.org>
To: W4QE@arrl.net <W4QE@arrl.net>
That point is being recognized. We are also increasing communication
with the AM broadcast industry and ARRL helped fund a participant in the
development of smart-grid immunity standards, benefitting the electric
utility industry. Amateur radio also benefitted big time because we can
only imagine what would happen if amateur radio transmissions repeatedly
took down the electric power grid. It was a 10-year effort, in
collaboration with the IEEE EMC Society and Power and Energy Society,
but the final standards included meaningful RF immunity standards for
protective relays and other equipment used in the developing smart-grid
technologies. As intitially written, a rock placed in the test fixture
would have passed. 🙂
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Jim Morgan <jvmorg@comcast.net>
*Sent:* Friday, January 20, 2023 8:09 AM
*To:* Hare, Ed, W1RFI <w1rfi@arrl.org>
*Subject:* Re: [RFI] DEFINITION OF "HARMFUL INTERFERENCE"
I have been following this thread with interest, and just wanted to
express appreciation to all for the (generally) civil tone of the
conversation. Clearly interference can be a touchy issue. I'm glad that
the ARRL is so involved both in the standards process and the
enforcement process. I agree with Ed that diplomacy is as important as
technology when trying to get to resolution of an interference issue.
Thank you Ed, and ARRL, for your involvement in this area.
It occurs to me that the work of amateurs in this area provides benefits
beyond the amateur community. RF devices are everywhere, and every time
we find and fix a source of interference on the ham bands, life also
gets better for some machine in a hospital, some theater or church using
wireless microphones, even the drive-through at your favorite fast-food
restaurant, who may not even know why their equipment is sometimes
"flaky" or has dropouts.
73 all,
Jim W4QE
On 1/20/2023 7:02 AM, Hare, Ed, W1RFI wrote:
> This has been my life's work, for over 35 years, and all that I know
has been built on the work of many people, not just my own. That is the
strength of organization.
>
> But I do have to note that is is more than a club, and our standing
with FCC and others is also built on decades of participation. When we
work with the FCC, we do so as authentically and productively as we can,
with a loyalty to what we believe to be the truth. We have this unique
position with the FCC because although we do strongly represent amateur
radio to their enforcement people, it is done in the light of creating a
reasonable process to help resolve cases, then supporting the process.
>
> It is done in parallel with similar work with the standardization
process, through entities like the IEEE, not only with seats at the
table, but with seats at the head of the table. I just completed an
10-year series of terms on the IEEE EMC Society Board of Directors,
twice as a Director-at-Large and three times as their elected Vice
President for Standards. I term-limited, so had to step down, but I am
continuing that work by supporting the new VP for Standards and by
serving its two major EMC committees in whatever ways they need me to
serve. ARRL has been a member of the US EMC committee, C63.org, that
writes standards often adopted by the FCC as regulation. I am the Chair
of its Subcommittee 5 on immunity. ARRL has had a representative on the
FCC Technological Advisory Council, bringing amateur radio and his
expertise on RF safety and RF in general to their work. ARRL, and
amateur radio, participated internationally as part of the ITU-R process
of helping to create internat
> ional RF law.
>
> So, when this "club" approaches the FCC at the staff level with a
request for help and an offer to help the help, it is now seen as a
legitimate request and a legitimate offer for help that will be
appropriate and reasonable in its expectations. The ARRL individuals
that have been elected by their peers to leadership positions have been
given those positions because they are legitimately contributing to real
industry processes, representing their stake and influencing the
outcome, but again, in ways that are appropriate and reasonable. It is
work that carries the strength of 700,000 US amateurs, with the ability
to take on some of the tasks and, when needed, to crowd source
informatiton that can be and is important and valuable to the
advancement of state of the art.
>
> So, when "the club" works with the FCC, all of that is known, all of
that is part of the processes and the FCC and others are coming around
to believe that what is being asked is for a greater good that ARRL has
helped establish a track record of greater-good achievement that shows
that amateur radio is still a valuable part of modern technological
advancement.
>
> Ed Hare, W1RFI
> ARRL Lab
>
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|