Two of those FCC lawyers helped create and maintain the process that ARRL and
FCC use to resolve harmful interference problems.
________________________________
From: RFI <rfi-bounces+w1rfi=arrl.org@contesting.com> on behalf of David
Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2023 2:59 PM
To: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Cc: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] DEFINITION OF "HARMFUL INTERFERENCE"
Yes, in my opinion, FCC is just a collection of overpaid lawyers who
wouldn't recognize RF if it bit them in the behind. Further, OET has been
gutted and Part 15, either subpart, is not enforced unless there is big $$
in it for the CFR 47 bureaucracy.
Just my opinion formed over the decades (six+ of those) as a licensed
amateur radio operator and an EMC/RFI engineer.
Dave - WØLEV
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 7:51 PM KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > *Harmful interference.* Interference which endangers the functioning of a
> > radionavigation service or of other safety services or seriously
> degrades,
> > obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunication service operating
> > in accordance with this chapter.
> >
> > This statement is reproduced in several places throughout CFR 47, but the
> > wording is essentially identical. Pretty general, but this is what FCC
> > legally plays to.
>
> No doubt the FCC addresses such, within moments of being reported, as it
> clearly violates their own rules, as defined by those experiencing it.
>
> Kurt
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
--
*Dave - WØLEV*
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|