[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65

To: Mark K3MSB <>
Subject: Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65
From: Cecil Acuff <>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 17:01:31 -0500
List-post: <">>
This discussion is going nowhere...and will continue to go nowhere with the 
exception of the ill will it spreads...on of all places...a group to discuss 
things related to "The Gentlemans Band"

None of the modes of operations discussed are violations of anyone's licenses 
so there is no real's all an issue of emotion.

Live and let live...


Sent using recycled electrons.

> On May 21, 2017, at 4:40 PM, Mark K3MSB <> wrote:
> Because I use my human skill that I developed over years to decode the CW
> signal.  You don't do that for RTTY.
> Unless of course you're referring to using a CW decoder wherein you just
> read the decoded CW.   You REALLY don't want to know what I fell about
> people that do that and say they "work CW".....
> Mark K3MSB
>> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 5:16 PM, <> wrote:
>> *  ...What makes an RTTY QSO run off your computer (since u retired the
>> Model 23) any different than a JT65 QSO...OR...using your memory (computer
>> ?) keyer to work CW ? It is no more difficult to make a computer-controlled
>> CW or RTTY QSO than a JT65 one..just try it if you don’t believe me. *
>> *            73 Jay NY2NY*
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives -

Topband Reflector Archives -
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>