I tried that when I held the call ZF2ET and on that particular suffix i think
it might have been a good thing. I went back and forth on doing it or not but
always paused slightly when sending by hand.
73…Stan ~ ZF9CW
> On Dec 7, 2022, at 6:49 PM, Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:
>
> I'll differ on the half space thing.
>
> I cut my repeat needs by at LEAST 75% and still get spotted by the RBN all
> the time, (well not much on 160 he he he)
>
> But on bands where i got good signals my repeats are far less when I use
>
> W9~E~T than when I use W9ET
>
> Joe WB9SBD
>
>> On 12/7/2022 9:13 AM, Mike VE9AA ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca wrote:
>> Lee et al,
>>
>> Which just goes to further prove my point. The RBN (& skimmers) are truly
>> wonderful tech, but they are not perfect even if your CW is (or nearly so).
>>
>> Please do not be surprised by the occasional bust or dupe if you are doing
>> something "weird" with your callsign by adding 1/2 spaces, slowing letters
>> down and whatnot.
>>
>> Human brains may (or maynot) be able to deal with that somewhat better (up
>> for debate - I personally dislike it done to most callsigns), but computers
>> don't 'know' what the intent is with that type of sending.
>>
>> VE9AA
>>
>> ======================
>> I get spotted as KX4M and KK4TT all the time. It does not matter if I send by
>> hand or through N1MM / Winkeyer.
>>
>> 73 de Lee KX4TT
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, December 7, 2022, 08:48:47 AM EST, <kq2m@kq2m.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ron,
>>
>> The wrong call sign spotting and "run of dupes" happens a few times a
>> year to me.
>> Bob, KQ2M</pre>
>> _________________
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
>>
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|